On 14
February, in one of the worst attacks on security forces in Jammu and Kashmir,
a suicide bomber of the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) rammed a car full of explosives
into a CRPF convoy killing over 40 personnel. The attack sent shockwaves across
the country and people transcended all barriers to stand in solidarity with the
security forces. In a rare sight, all political parties pledged support to the
Government in any retaliatory action it would initiate.
At a
time when almost everyone had refrained from politicising the martyrdom of our
soldiers, the ruling establishment at the Centre left no stone unturned to score brownie points. From Amit Shah to Sakshi Maharaj, the intention
was clear, to stroke sentiments ahead of general elections. But now, I think it
is time to shed restraint and ask a few questions.
Intelligence
Failure
It is
now known that the Jaish-e-Mohammed had issued a video threat 48 hours before
the Pulwama attack. Why did the Government ignore that threat? If it did
investigate the video, why were adequate measures not taken?
On 8
February 2019, the Jammu and Kashmir Police had given a specific intelligence
input that before occupying the area of deployment, there was a need for proper
sanitization as the terrorists are believed to be using IEDs. Why was this
specific input ignored? In a state which is under President’s Rule, with whom
does the buck stop for this lapse?
In a
Government where the National Security Advisor is more powerful that the Home
Minister and where the Prime Minister is above everyone else, isn’t it ethical
on the part of the NSA and the Prime Minister to own responsibility (just as he
claims credit for Surgical Strikes) for the failure of Intelligence Apparatus
of the Centre?
Security
Breach
The
Jaish recruit who carried out the attack was a local terrorist. How did they
acquire hundreds of KGs of RDX, M4 Carbine and rocket launchers? How did the
car filled with RDX gain entry into the most secure Jammu-Srinagar National
Highway when the convoy was to pass through (despite the standard operating
procedure for sanitization)? Was it a sound decision to move over 2,000 troops
in a single convoy?
Prima
facie, it appears that failure of Centre’s intelligence apparatus and lack of
attention to State Police’s input lead to this security breach.
Security
Casualties
Since
the current Government assumed office, the numbers of security and civilian
casualties have been on the rise with 448 jawans martyred and 280 civilians
killed in the 56 months that they have been in office. This is one of the
highest in the area during peacetime.
Apart
from this, there 5,595 ceasefire violations by Pakistan along the Line of
Control (LOC) since May 2014 which the Government has not been able to contain.
To add to this, there have been attacks on strategically important Pathankot
Air Base, Uri and Nagrota Military Camps. The Government, especially the Prime
Minister and Defence Minister, may boast of a muscular ‘56 inch chest’ policy
the data tells a different story.
The
Pakistan Policy
When
I look at the events since May 2014 vis-à-vis Pakistan, I wonder whether this
Government does have a policy towards Pakistan! Be it inviting Nawaz Sharif to
the swearing-in ceremony, the saree-shawl diplomacy, the exchange of ‘love
letters’ and Mangoes, landing in Pakistan un-invited, or inviting the infamous
ISI to ‘investigate’ the Pathankot attacks, just to recollect a few, are all
symptoms of what I call the Hamletian Dilemma: ‘To do or not to do’.
This
confusion in policy (if there is one), in my belief, has given Pakistan an
advantage in doing all the wretched things it does.
The
J&K Policy
In my
previous blog on Jammu and Kashmir, I have written at length on the situation
in the state, especially in the valley. I pains me to note that the situation
has, in-fact worsened since the time I wrote that blog. Mr Modi’s J&K
policy has reversed the progress achieved in the state since 2002, baring the
incident of 2010. The people of Jammu & Kashmir are more alienated today
than ever before. This Government has refused to accept the reality that a
Rambo and James Bond approach will not work in Jammu & Kashmir. The only
policy that healed the wounds of the people there was Mr Vajpayee’s policy of ‘Insaniyat,
Jamooriyat and Kashmiriyat’. In-fact, this was the policy that Dr Manmohan
Singh continued in his tenure and reaped huge dividends. Militancy was at an
all time low and Srinagar was booming with commercial activity.
This
Government started its tenure from a wrong point. The aggressive promise of
repealing article 370, which is the core of J&K’s accession to the Indian
State and its flip-flop of article 35A, another emotive issue for the people
there resulted in alienation. The BJP’s presence in the J&K Government with
the PDP further worsened the matter. Today, the three regions of the state
(Jammu, Kashmir and Ladak) are pulling apart. Unfortunately, PM Modi’s public
comments on J&K and his Government’s policies or for that matter his party’s
actions, are in extreme opposite directions.
By
turning a blind eye to the attack on Kashmiri students by elements affiliated
to the Sangh Pariwar and with a Governor (affiliated to BJP) calling openly for
boycott of Kashmiri products, the BJP has further deepened the divide. Further,
the BJP has been using J&K to polarize the country and fight the upcoming
elections on the plank of hyper-nationalism.
The
Way Ahead
Listing
the problems alone is not enough, we must also think of the road ahead. In the
aftermath of the Pulwama attacks, the Government must adopt a combination of
economic, diplomatic and military approach towards Pakistan. While it deals
Pakistan with a ‘iron fist’, it must shed its muscular approach in J&K and
adopt a more compassionate approach in the state. Apart from this, I am very
firm in my belief that India must engage Pakistan’s military leadership in a
dialogue. It would be good if our National Security Advisor and Pakistan’s Army
Chief have a dialogue at a neutral location. I know that I would be certified
as anti-national by the BJP for this suggestion, especially at the background
of Pulwama, but any sane individual will know that war is not an option when
both the countries are nuclear-armed.
Comments
Post a Comment