Yesterday the Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presented the Union Budget for 2025-26. It was her 8th
consecutive Budget and was presented amongst great expectations from the
people. It was hoped that the NDA Government led by the Hon’ble Prime Minister
Narendra Modi would come up with some concrete policies to help the country
emerge from the current challenges it faces.
The
Economic Context
The Union Budget was being
presented at the backdrop of acute unemployment, rising inflation, rural distress,
decline in manufacturing, stagnant incomes and declining savings. Data from the
Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) shows that in 2022-23, youth
unemployment was at 45.4%1. A study of the International Labour
Organisation notes that graduates had an unemployment rate of 29.1%2.
The Labour Force Participation Rate in rural areas increased from 24.6% in
2017-18 to 47.6% in 2023-24. While the increase in LFPR is good, we must not
ignore that more women participation in rural areas may also indicate rural
distress, which is compelling women to join work.
Another point of concern is
the decline of manufacturing sector. Agriculture Labour in 2004-05 was 58.5%
and Manufacturing Labour was 11.7%. The UPA Government of Dr Manmohan Singh expanded
the manufacturing sector due to which Manufacturing Labour increased to 12.6% and
Agriculture Labour declined to 48.7%. The cause of concern now is that
Manufacturing Labour is declining continuously under the Modi Government and
has now gone below the 2004-05 level to 11.4% in 2023-24. According to the
Central Government’s own Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), around 22
crore individuals applied for central government positions but only 7.22 lakh
persons were employed3. This itself, in my view, highlights the
unemployment crisis. The poorest 20% of the households have faced drastic
decline in their incomes and household debt has risen to around 39% of GDP.
It was in this background that
the Finance Minister was presenting the Budget.
The
Chief Economic Advisor’s words of wisdom
The Chief Economic Advisor to
the Government of India, has given prudent advice to the Government in the
Economic Survey tabled in parliament by the Finance Minister on 31st
January 2025. The CEA’s advice to the Government to ‘get out of the way’ has
been completely negated by the Finance Minister in the Budget.
Cuts in Expenditure on Major Schemes
To achieve its target of
fiscal deficit, the Government has effected very harsh expenditure cuts on
major schemes in the current year as shown in the following table:
|
Scheme |
Budget Estimate |
Revised Estimate |
Cut in
Expenditure |
|
Rashtriya
Krishi Vikas Yojana |
7,553 |
6,000 |
1,553 |
|
Krishionnati
Yojana |
7,447 |
7,106 |
341 |
|
PM-POSHAN |
12,467 |
10,000 |
2,467 |
|
Strengthening
Teaching-Learning and Results for States (STARS) |
1,250 |
850 |
400 |
|
PM
Schools for Rising India (PM SHRI) |
6,050 |
4,500 |
1,550 |
|
Pradhan
Mantri Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (PM-USHA) |
1,815 |
895 |
920 |
|
Pradhan
Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY) |
2,352 |
1,500 |
852 |
|
Human
Resources for Health and Medical Education |
1,275 |
579 |
696 |
|
Modernisation
of Police Forces |
3,720 |
2,624 |
1,096 |
|
Vibrant
Villages Programme |
1,050 |
209 |
841 |
|
Pradhan
Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) Urban |
30,171 |
13,670 |
16,501 |
|
AMRUT
(Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation) |
8,000 |
6,000 |
2,000 |
|
National
Urban Digital Mission (NUDM) |
1,150 |
109 |
1,041 |
|
Swacch
Bharat Mission – Urban |
5,000 |
2,159 |
2,841 |
|
PM
e-Bus Sewa Scheme |
1,300 |
500 |
800 |
|
Pradhan
Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana |
8,250 |
6,621 |
1,629 |
|
Interlinking
of Rivers |
4,000 |
2,000 |
2,000 |
|
Jal
Jeevan Mission |
70,163 |
22,694 |
47,469 |
|
Rashtiya
Gram Swaraj Abhiyan (RGSA) |
1,064 |
785 |
279 |
|
Pradhan
Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana |
19,000 |
14,500 |
4,500 |
|
Pradhan
Mantri Awas Yojana – Grameen (PMAY –G) |
54,500 |
32,426 |
22,074 |
|
Watershed
Development Component-Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana |
2,501 |
1,800 |
701 |
|
New
ITI Upgradation Scheme |
1,000 |
294 |
706 |
|
Post
Matric Scholarship for SCs |
6,360 |
5,500 |
860 |
|
Pradhan
Mantri Anusuchit Jaati Abhyuday
Yojana (PM AJAY) |
2,140 |
800 |
1,340 |
|
PM Young Achievers Scholarship Award
Scheme for Vibrant India (PM YASASVI) for OBCs, EBCs and DNTs |
1,836 |
1,381 |
455 |
|
PM
Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana |
4,300 |
3,360 |
940 |
|
Saksham Anganwadi and POSHAN 2.0
(Umbrella ICDS-Anganwadi Services, Poshan Abhiyan, Scheme for Adolescent Girls) |
21,200 |
20,071 |
1,129 |
|
Mission
Shakti (Mission for Protection and Empowerment for Women) |
3,146 |
1,451 |
1,695 |
|
Nuclear
Power Projects |
2,228 |
1,500 |
728 |
|
Development
of Pharmaceutical Industries |
1,300 |
359 |
941 |
|
Pradhan
Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY) |
2,05,250 |
1,97,000 |
8,250 |
|
New
Internship Programme |
2,000 |
380 |
1,620 |
|
Construction
Works (Defence) |
12,017 |
10,562 |
1,455 |
|
Projects
of the Air Force |
1,697 |
377 |
1,320 |
|
North East Special Infrastructure Development
Scheme (NESIDS) |
2,491 |
1,500 |
991 |
|
Prime Minister's Development Initiative
for North East Region (PM-DevINE) |
2,200 |
1,394 |
806 |
|
PM Uchchatar Shiksha Protsahan (PM-USP)
Yojna |
1,558 |
1,000 |
558 |
|
India AI Mission |
552 |
173 |
379 |
|
Modified
Programme for Development of Semiconductors and Display Manufacturing Ecosystem
in India |
6,903 |
3,816 |
3,087 |
|
Production
Linked Incentive Scheme (PLI) (MeiTY) |
6,200 |
5,777 |
423 |
|
Livestock Health and Disease Control
Programme |
2,465 |
1,980 |
485 |
|
Production-Linked
Incentive Scheme for Food Processing Industry |
1,444 |
700 |
744 |
|
Pardhan
Mantri Swasthya Suraksha Yojana |
2,200 |
1,736 |
1,464 |
|
Production
Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for Automobiles and Auto Components |
3,500 |
347 |
3,153 |
|
Border
Infrastructure and Management |
3,757 |
3,070 |
687 |
|
Police
Infrastructure |
3,152 |
1,986 |
1,166 |
|
National
Ganga Plan |
3,346 |
3,000 |
346 |
|
Atal
Bhujal Yojana |
1,778 |
600 |
1,178 |
|
New
Employment Generation Scheme |
10,000 |
6,779 |
3,221 |
|
e-Courts
Phase III |
1,500 |
1,200 |
300 |
|
Khadi
Gramodyog Vikas Yojana |
1,037 |
866 |
171 |
|
Prime
Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP) |
2,300 |
1,918 |
382 |
|
Guarantee
Emergency Credit Line (GECL) facility to eligible MSME borrowers |
9,813 |
7,500 |
2,313 |
|
Raising
and Accelerating MSME Performance - RAMP |
1,170 |
750 |
420 |
|
PM
Vishwakarma |
4,824 |
4,000 |
824 |
|
Solar
Power (Grid) |
10,000 |
1,300 |
8,700 |
|
Direct
Benefit Transfer – LPG |
1,500 |
500 |
1,000 |
|
New
Lines (Railways) |
34,603 |
31,459 |
3,144 |
|
Electrification
Projects (Railways) |
6,472 |
6,072 |
400 |
|
Traffic
Facilities – Yard Remodelling and Others (Railways) |
8,983 |
8,599 |
384 |
|
Road
Works (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways) |
1,15,093 |
1,10,576 |
4,517 |
|
Skill
India Programme |
2,686 |
2,318 |
368 |
|
Space
Technology (Department of Space) |
10,088 |
8,986 |
1,102 |
|
Eklavya
Model Residential Schools (EMRS) |
6,399 |
4,749 |
1,650 |
|
Integrated
Development of Tourist Circuits around specific themes (Swadesh Darshan) |
1,750 |
350 |
1,400 |
Expenditure cuts in these major schemes should mean any of these two: 1) the Government does not have the money to spend or 2) the Government has been in-efficient in planning & implementation.
Rural Distress
The Finance Minister was silent on major demands of farmers such as legal guarantee for MSP. The Finance Minister was also silent on issues such as Inflation indexation of PM-Kisan payouts and reforms to PM Fasal Bima Yojana. The Finance Minister has also not increased the allocation for MGNREGA despite increase in rural labour. Cuts in expenditure of PMGSY and PM Awas Yojana-Gramin also shows that Government’s focus is not on rural development.
Unemployment
As I have written in the earlier part of this essay, unemployment remains a challenge. This Budget does not spell out any concrete action plan for employment generation. The Government has also failed to effectively implement the Internship programme announced in the last Budget.
Tax Policy
The most discussed aspect of the Budget is rebate for those having income of 12 lakh per annum (other than capital gains). Without any hesitation, I welcome the announcement of tax relief. But we must also not ignore the fact that this decision shrinks the tax base of the Government, which has already cut public expenditure. The budget documents indicate that income tax revenue will make up around 33% of total tax revenue. This means that the Finance Minister will depend more on a shrunk tax base. I feel that this might increase scrutiny and empower the IT Department (despite the FM’s statement that tax policy will be based on trust).
If the Finance Minister really wanted to give relief to middle-class across the board, she should have cut taxes on fuel, thought of some mechanism to regulate private school fees, and initiated complete reform of GST. The Government has also become completely silent on Direct Tax Code which was piloted by the UPA Government.
Corporate Tax is estimated to grow by only 6% whereas income tax is expected to grow by 21%. Despite this, the Finance Minister has cut capital expenditure in the current year and hasn’t significantly increased it for the next year and has decided to stress on PPPs. This shows that the Government is expecting private investment to pick up but the Budget doesn’t spell out how it expects it to happen.
Conclusion
This Budget, in my view based
on the above reasons, does not address the crucial problems faced by the
country, ignores the demands of many states, and places too much emphasis on
up-coming elections. To me, itseems like the Government is bankrupt of ideas to
help the economy navigate the current challenges. I also feel that by effecting
cuts in expenditure on key schemes (in current year) and by not spelling out
concrete policies to tackle unemployment, rural distress, inflation, and
sluggish private investment, the Finance Minister has betrayed the hopes of
those in need.
References:
1. https://www.cmie.com/kommon/bin/sr.php?kall=warticle&dt=20230926184023&msec=816
Well thought out and written
ReplyDeleteThe conclusion summary 👌