Skip to main content

Finance or Fiction?

On 23rd July 2024, the Union Finance Minister Mrs Nirmala Sitharaman presented her seventh consecutive Union Budget. With this being the first Union Budget after the Lok Sabha election, there was considerable enthusiasm towards the Budget.

The Impact of Election result on Budget  

The Budget speech of the Finance Minister clearly shows us that the Lok Sabha election result has shaken the BJP to some extent. The principal ruling party, known for its arrogant approach over the past ten years, was forced to accommodate some of the demands of its key allies the JDU of Bihar and TDP of Andhra Pradesh. The Finance Minister, who was dismissive about the unemployment crisis earlier, was forced to mention the words 'unemployment' and 'jobs' more than 20 times in the Budget Speech.

The Impact of Budget on the four 'castes'

In paragraph 4 of her Budget Speech, the Finance Minister said: "As mentioned in the interim budget, we need to focus on 4 major castes, namely ‘Garib’ (Poor), ‘Mahilayen’ (Women), ‘Yuva’ (Youth) and ‘Annadata’ (Farmer).". What has the Finance Minister given in the Budget for these four 'castes'?

  • 'Garib' (Poor)
One of the biggest problems affecting the poor of our country is inflation. The Whole-sale Price Index (WPI) inflation is at 3.4%, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation is at 5.1% and food inflation is at 9.4%. Across the country we hear the people expressing their distress on price rise of essential commodities but the Chief Economic Advisor to the Government says that inflation is stable and is moving towards the 4% target. Why doesn't the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) or the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) have the same confidence? If the RBI had faith in these numbers of the Government, why has it not reduced interest rates since almost a year?

The CEO of NITI Ayog says that India has almost eliminated poverty, if this is true, why is the Government giving free ration to 80 crore people?
  • 'Mahilayen' (Women)
The women of our country are dis-empowered mainly due to patriarchy, financial discrimination and regressive socio-economic practices. According to NCRB report published in December 2023 4,45,000 cases of crimes against women were registered. Male casual workers earn 48 per cent more than women and male regular-wage workers earn 24 per cent more than women. Labour Force Participation rate for urban women is 24.0 as against 73.8 per cent for men.

Boastful claims & catchy slogans of women empowerment and Nari Shakti is of no use unless these disparities are addressed.
  • 'Yuva' (Youth)
Despite being in office for ten years, this Government has not ensured that the demography of the country benefits the economy. As I had written earlier this year that according to the State of Working India Report (of Azim Premji University), the unemployment rate in youth between the age of 15-29 is 10%. Among graduates, the unemployment is 9.8% (between the age of 30-34) and among graduates under the age of 25, the unemployment rate is 42%.**

However, I appreciate the Finance Minister for accepting the idea mentioned in the Congress Party's Manifesto and announcing the Employment Linked Incentive (ELI) scheme. But in paragraph 51 of the Budget Speech, the Finance Minister has said that this ELI scheme is limited only to the top 500 companies. It remains to be seen if 20 lakh interns can be accommodated each year by these 500 companies.
  • 'Annadata' (Farmer)
The Finance Minister was vocal about farmers. But what missed in the Budget was that as per NCRB Report, there were 11,290 farmer suicides in 2022. It is also pertinent to note that the Government has spent lesser than the Budget Estimate in 2023-24 on key agricultural schemes such as Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana, Interlinking of Rivers, Urea Subsidy and Fertilizer Subsidy.

Despite the demands of farmers, the Government has failed to provide legal guarantee for MSP to farmers.

The 'Jumla' continues

Despite suffering an electoral setback, the BJP has continued with its Jumla policy. This time the Jumla is for Andhra Pradesh. Despite being in power for ten years, the BJP did not bother to fulfill the commitments made in Andhra Pradesh Re-organisation Act 2014 and the assurances made by then Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh on the floor of Rajya Sabha. Now that the survival of its Government depends on the TDP, the BJP has remembered Andhra Pradesh. But it is unfortunate that even now, the State of Andhra Pradesh has not got justice.

In paragraph 29 of the Budget Speech, the Finance Minister says that they will formulate a plan called Purvodaya, for the all-round development of the eastern region of the country covering
Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Odisha and Andhra Pradesh. So unless the plan is announced, we will not know which of these states will get what facility and the allocation for it.

Also, in paragraph 33, the Finance Minister says that "Recognizing the state’s need for a capital, we will facilitate special financial support through multilateral development agencies. In the current financial year 15,000 crore will be arranged, with additional amounts in future years." (emphasis is mine) This clearly shows that the Union Government has not made this allocation for Andhra Pradesh but is only facilitating a loan which will have to be repaid by the Government of Andhra Pradesh!

In paragraph 36, the Finance Minister says that "Grants for backward regions of Rayalaseema, Prakasam and North Coastal Andhra, as stated in the Act, will also be provided." but does not specify how much grant will be provided.

Also, the Finance Minister has not said anything in the Budget Speech about providing Special Category Status for Andhra Pradesh, as assured by the then Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh on the floor of the Rajya Sabha.

Conclusion

Despite this being the first Budget of the new term, the Finance Minister, in my opinion, has not tried to bring path breaking reforms such as Direct Tax Code and other such reforms. It is also saddening to see less allocation for Education as a percentage of the Budget. The Budget does not specify any policy action to mitigate the problems of the 'Garib', the 'Mahila' and the 'Kisan'. While the Government seems to have acknowledged the problem of unemployment, the steps taken do not seem sufficient and does not inspire confidence, given their track record of Jumlas.

With jumlas, empty promises and hollow words, the Union Budget 2024-25, to me, seems more of fiction than about Finance.

** note: at present, there might be a change in the statistics mentioned above 

Comments

  1. Another must read.
    A well thought out piece 👏
    Keep it coming Varun 👍

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE SABARIMALA JUDGEMENT: PROGRESSIVE OR OVER-BOARD? (Part 2)

  In the earlier part , I had provided a brief background to the case that was before the Court, the issues/questions that were placed before the Constitution Bench for its consideration, and the Judgement delivered by the Bench. In this part, let us explore those four questions and a few other aspects of the Judgement. Maintainability   Students of Law who are reading this blog might laugh at this point: how could maintainability be taken seriously in a PIL? Justice Indu Malhotra answers this question in her dissenting judgement:   (P. 7.2) “ The right to move the Supreme Court under Article 32 for violation of Fundamental Rights, must be based on a pleading that the Petitioners’ personal rights to worship in this Temple have been violated. The Petitioners do not claim to be devotees of the Sabarimala Temple where Lord Ayyappa is believed to have manifested himself as a ‘Naishtik Brahmachari’. To determine the validity of long-standing religious customs and usages ...

THE SABARIMALA JUDGEMENT: PROGRESSIVE OR OVER-BOARD? (Part 1)

  On 28 September 2018, a five judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court lifted the ban on entry of women between the age group of 10 to 50 years into the Sabarimala Temple in a 4:1 majority decision. While many have welcomed and celebrated the verdict, it has given rise to spontaneous protests across Kerala, some of which are being led by women themselves. This judgement is very important as it will be quoted extensively in other cases that are already before the Court or in ones that would come up before the Court in future. Therefore, it is important to examine this question: Was the judgement progressive or did the judges go over-board? The Background The case started with a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in the Supreme Court by a registered association called Indian Young Lawyers Association. In their petition they challenged the Constitutional validity of Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Rules, 1965, which restr...

THE STATE OF EDUCATION IN INDIA [PART 2]

Last week, I had written about the cracks in our education policy. In this blog I wish to look at the possible policy actions that can plug these loopholes. Access The number of students enrolled in primary and secondary school is way below global average. Therefore the focus of the policy makers must be on increasing the Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER). The Right to Education Act, 2009 has done a great deal in making enrolment in primary schools nearly universal. The trends noticed thereafter suggest that the children tend to drop out when they reach high school. Therefore the best policy approach, atleast for the foreseeable future, would be to amend the Right to Education Act and expand its scope upto Class 12. A rights/entitlement based approach is the best way forward for now. Quality To enhance quality we have already embraced e-learning, however it is a well-known fact that internet penetration in our country is very low. To enhance the use of ICT in schools, the go...

Agenda 2019: NYAY for Jammu & Kashmir

Four phases of the world’s biggest democratic exercise – elections to the 17 th Lok Sabha – have been completed. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party led by Mr Narendra Modi are extensively banking on the National Security plank to get back to power for one more term. Mr Modi has been saying since the first day of campaign that he has used an ‘Iron Fist’ in dealing with Pakistan. He refers to the surgical strikes done by the Indian Air Force in Balakot as an example of his tough policy. Despite bringing National Security issues to the fore, he refuses to speak about one of the biggest security challenges: Jammu and Kashmir. In my previous essays: ‘ Pulwama Attack: Time to Raise a Few Questions & Explore the Reasons ’ and ‘ The Turmoil In India’s Paradise ’, I have written in detail about the current Government’s policy with respect to Pakistan and Jammu and Kashmir. In this essay I wish to share what I feel the new Government must do with regard to J&K. The Two Aspects...

'One Nation One Election': Feasibility and Impact on Democracy

I write this essay in the backdrop of the High Level Committee (HLC) on One Nation One Election submitting its report to the President of India on 14 March 2024. At the very outset, it seems like as if the Union Government had made up its mind on what the outcome of HLC would be at the time of Constituting the HLC itself. To substantiate this, I would like to draw attention to the Gazette Notification issued on 02 September 2023. The Gazette Notification itself has concluded that “ elections are held almost every year and within a year too at different times, which result in massive expenditure by the Government and other stakeholders, diversion of security forces and other electoral officers engaged in such elections from their primary duties for significantly prolonged periods, disruption in developmental work on account of prolonged application of Model Code of Conduct, etc.; ”.   Therefore, I firmly believe that the HLC could not attempt a dispassionate analysis of the pros a...

MODI-FICATION OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR: MASTERSTROKE OR MISADVENTURE?

On 5 August 2019, Home Minister Amit Shah announced in the Rajya Sabha that a Presidential Order would be issued to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which provides special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. He further said that Jammu and Kashmir would be bifurcated into two Union Territories: UT of Jammu & Kashmir (with legislature) and UT of Ladak (without legislature). A resolution to this effect was passed by the Rajya Sabha on the same day. The Build-up Ahead of this announcement, the Union Government sent additional troops to the state to ‘maintain peace and order’ in wake of an ‘intelligence input’. They went to the extent of taking an unprecedented decision of suddenly cancelling the Amarnath Yatra. Mainstream political leaders like former Chief Ministers Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti were placed under house arrest, communication services were withdrawn and curfew was imposed (it continues even now). What is Article 370? Article...

Pulwama Attack: Time to Raise a Few Questions & Explore the Reasons

On 14 February, in one of the worst attacks on security forces in Jammu and Kashmir, a suicide bomber of the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) rammed a car full of explosives into a CRPF convoy killing over 40 personnel. The attack sent shockwaves across the country and people transcended all barriers to stand in solidarity with the security forces. In a rare sight, all political parties pledged support to the Government in any retaliatory action it would initiate. At a time when almost everyone had refrained from politicising the martyrdom of our soldiers, the ruling establishment at the Centre left no stone unturned to score brownie points. From Amit Shah to Sakshi Maharaj, the intention was clear, to stroke sentiments ahead of general elections. But now, I think it is time to shed restraint and ask a few questions. Intelligence Failure It is now known that the Jaish-e-Mohammed had issued a video threat 48 hours before the Pulwama attack. Why did the Government ignore that threat?...

Bankruptcy of Ideas and Betrayal of Hope

Yesterday the Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presented the Union Budget for 2025-26. It was her 8 th consecutive Budget and was presented amongst great expectations from the people. It was hoped that the NDA Government led by the Hon’ble Prime Minister Narendra Modi would come up with some concrete policies to help the country emerge from the current challenges it faces. The Economic Context The Union Budget was being presented at the backdrop of acute unemployment, rising inflation, rural distress, decline in manufacturing, stagnant incomes and declining savings. Data from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) shows that in 2022-23, youth unemployment was at 45.4% 1 . A study of the International Labour Organisation notes that graduates had an unemployment rate of 29.1% 2 . The Labour Force Participation Rate in rural areas increased from 24.6% in 2017-18 to 47.6% in 2023-24. While the increase in LFPR is good, we must not ignore that more women participation in ru...

THE TURMOIL IN INDIA’S PARADISE

Having been to the wonderful state of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) and seen its people, I am extremely saddened by the way in which things are shaping up in the paradise of India. Since July 2016, J&K has been simmering with anger and exasperation. This has not happened overnight, the lava was slowly but steadily building up and Burhan Wani’s encounter just provided the trigger. Despite the fact that one of our state is in turmoil for nearly two years now, we as citizens, as a Nation, do not seem to have sensed the gravity of the matter. Unfortunately, even the Government of India doesn’t seem to have comprehended the situation. Day in and Day out we watch people shouting on prime time TV shows that J&K is an integral part of India, we heard the Prime Minister roar in the Parliament by making an hypothetical reference to J&K earlier this year; Ofcourse Jammu & Kashmir is an integral part of India! But are we as a Nation, as a society, awake and aware of the pain...

THE POLITICS OF TRIPLE TALAQ

Yesterday (i.e. 19 September), the Union Cabinet cleared the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights of Marriage) Ordinance 2018 which criminalises instant triple talaq. The ordinance was subsequently signed by the President. This Ordinance is a farce, a violation of certain principles of jurisprudence and most importantly it sets a dangerous precedent in legislation process. Let us look at each of these issues in detail. The Ordinance route The power to promulgate an Ordinance is an extraordinary power vested with the executive. Through the instrument of Ordinances, the government can make laws to meet urgent needs during a time when Parliament is not in session. However, such Ordinances have to be approved by Parliament within six weeks of the next session of the Parliament. On 23 July 2017, then President Shri Pranab Mukherjee, while addressing the Parliament made an observation regarding Ordinances which is as follows: “I am firm in the opinion that the Ordinance rout...